DeGrandis Works · Toolbox

OmniSorb

Acoustic Absorber System Designer · Design finished absorber panels, compare constructions, and predict coefficient and sabins per unit. Engineering predictions—not certified laboratory test results.
v1.6.0 · OFFLINE

Absorber panel construction

Choose the finished panel size, then build the assembly from room side to rigid backing.
Panel size
2 × 4 ft · 8.00 ft² face area Depth 0 mm
Rigid-backed one-port system. Transmission is zero; internal reflections are solved by the transfer matrix. Sealed perimeter does not add porous side-entry absorption.
1Layer stackRoom side → rigid backing
Click a layer to edit
Room / listener side
Rigid backing / wall
2Exploded isometric view
Room side → backing
Each numbered callout corresponds directly to the same numbered layer in the stack. Layer spacing is exploded for visibility; thickness labels are actual design values.
Acoustic model settings
°C
kPa
%
Hz
Hz

Absorber performance

Intrinsic assembly coefficient and finite-object equivalent absorption area for one finished panel.
Graph
Hover the graph to inspect the nearest curve. Click or tap to pin a point; the black dashed guide drops to the corresponding frequency.
current design diffuse estimate saved comparisons
—
Face area
—
NRC-like α*
—
NRC sabins / unit*
—
SAA-like α*
—
Target-band avg. α
—
Assembly depth
—
125 Hz transmission
*Intrinsic α is energy absorption and remains 0–1. Sabins/unit use the selected finite-panel, exposed-edge, and mounting equivalent-area estimates; equivalent absorption area can exceed panel face area in reverberation-room object behavior.

Design target

Set the performance goal and depth constraint. The first design-assist search uses these same requirements.
—
Hz
Hz
mm
Target evaluation updates with the stack.

Design assistant · first-round generator

Beam-searches practical library combinations under the maximum depth, then re-evaluates the finalists with the full mounting model.
Search scoring uses intrinsic mounted performance for the target. Corner pressure-zone gain and empirical finite-edge apparent-area corrections are excluded from the objective so the optimizer cannot “win” by exploiting an apparent coefficient above 1.
No search run yet.
Band performance · coefficient + sabins per unit
Layer energy & impedance inspector
Hz
Normal incidence. Separates direct dissipated power from system-level impedance / phase contribution. Scrub the slider to watch each layer change influence continuously.
20 Hzlog frequency20 kHz
125 Hz
—

Parameter sensitivity at inspected frequency

Numerical +5% perturbation audit. This verifies which material inputs actually enter the current assembly physics at this frequency; near-zero sensitivity can be physically expected for some model/parameter combinations.
Layer assumptions & confidence
Published material & assembly validation references
Model notes

Energy balance: rigid-backed constructions are solved as one-port networks (T = 0). Freestanding constructions are solved as two-port networks and report reflection, transmission, and intrinsic absorption from A = 1 − R − T. Temperature, pressure and humidity update the ambient air density, sound speed and viscosity used by every layer.

Porous layers: generalized Miki, five-parameter JCA, or six-parameter JCAL equivalent-fluid propagation is driven by airflow resistivity/transport properties. Generalized Miki now uses porosity and tortuosity explicitly; optional Bies–Hansen fiberglass estimation can couple bulk density + fiber diameter back into flow resistivity. Low-density flexible batts can use Panneton’s limp-frame effective-density correction; rigid boards default to rigid-frame behavior.

Limp membranes: MLV is treated as a surface mass with explicit surface resistance, tension and a frequency-dependent viscoelastic mass-loss term. Preset MLV can derive surface mass from bulk density × sheet thickness, so thickness changes can alter the acoustic inertance when that coupling is enabled. A nominally lossless membrane still changes impedance and creates coupled cavity/porous resonances even when its own direct dissipation is small.

Ports: small microperforations use a Maa-style viscothermal impedance approximation. Larger holes use a macro-perforation/Helmholtz neck model with open ratio, inertance, viscous loss, and end correction.

Layer interaction: the energy inspector reports direct dissipated power, Δα if each layer is removed, and a +5% parameter sensitivity audit. Impedance discontinuities are not assigned fictional loss: they change reflection, standing-wave phase and particle velocity so neighboring lossy layers dissipate differently. Air cavities additionally support an optional thermoviscous wall-loss model; for full-size panel cavities this direct loss is normally much smaller than the cavity’s impedance-transforming effect.

Finite panels: intrinsic absorption remains bounded by 1. The optional finite-size correction is shown as reverberation-room equivalent absorption area / sabins, not as a second coefficient curve. It estimates object area effects from panel perimeter, wavelength, porous thickness and density. Open porous edges add a separately flagged side-entry engineering estimate. Hybrid/membrane edge correction is extrapolative.

Corner mounting: wall-parallel corner mode keeps the rigid-backed stack and adds an adjacent-boundary field term. The 45° bridge mode discretizes the panel width into strips and solves the triangular rear wedge as a distribution of rigidly terminated cavity depths from near-zero at the wall contacts to half the panel span at the center. A user pressure-zone gain can represent a known local modal antinode, but it affects apparent/equivalent area only because room-modal amplitude cannot be inferred from panel geometry alone.

Design assistant: the first-round generator uses a constrained beam search over practical porous thicknesses, air gaps and optional facings/membranes. It performs a fast normal-incidence screening pass, then re-scores finalists with the full mounted diffuse/corner model. Suggested designs are candidates, not global mathematical proofs of optimality.

Limits: this is an advanced transfer-matrix engineering model, not a 3-D Biot/FE/BEM solver. Structural frame elasticity, detailed edge framing, exact modal radiation, nonlocal reaction, flanking paths and mounting hardware can require measured data or numerical multiphysics analysis.

Research sources

Add acoustic layer

Choose a material
Select a material to insert it at the chosen + position. Categories can be collapsed. Custom model layers are under Custom.
All calculations update immediately after insertion.